Preformed paediatric crowns: little evidence for aesthetic crowns

PMC 2

Only 7 small studies at high risk of bias were available for this review of preformed paediatric aesthetic crowns. They provide little evidence on which to r change of practice particular for posterior teeth where the use of stainless steel crowns is recommended.

[read the full story...]

Composite restorations: no difference in longevity with direct or indirect placement

shutterstock_123309100 - tooth coloured restoration before & after

This review of the clinical performance of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent teeth included 9 small RCTs . The findings suggest no difference in clinical longevity but the evidence is limited.

[read the full story...]

EDTA conditioning improved cervical restoration retention

shutterstock_113645092

This trial involving 48 patients found that EDTA conditioning improved the retention of restoration in non-carious cervical lesions at 18 months.

[read the full story...]

Laminate restorations in posterior teeth: evidence limited

shutterstock_126711704

This review included 13 small studies of limited quality. While the available evidence suggests there may be no difference, further long-term high quality studies are required to confirm if this is the case.

[read the full story...]

Posterior resin restorations: high survival at 4 years

shutterstock_123309100 - tooth coloured restoration before & after

This review of 8 studies involving 910 posterior resin restorations in 420 patients found a survival rate at 4 years = 0.93 (95% CI; 0.91- 0.95). However, the overall quality of the evidence was low.

[read the full story...]

Cervical composite resin restorations: bevel or not?

shutterstock_1445977

The number of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) that will require management in the future is expected to increase. This review was only able to identify 4 RCTs looking at whether bevelling the enamel margin improves retention, so there is limited evidence for the clinician.

[read the full story...]

Composite resin restorations- which adhesive system?

shutterstock_51036883

This study compared Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive after 8 years, finding no difference between the two approaches.

[read the full story...]

Composite resin restorations: no good evidence to assess impact on dental pulp

shutterstock_67671655

Only 10 low quality studies were available for this review to assess if a vital pulp restored with composite resin is at greater risk of pulpal complications than one restored with other materials. Questions over the studies qualities make it difficult to draw any conclusions.

[read the full story...]

Review suggests that caries risk and number of restored surfaces impact on posterior composite survival rates

shutterstock_123309100

Dental amalgam has been the filing material for choice for more than 150 years. However, because of their aesthetics and concern over their mercury content their use has been declining. The Minamata Convention on Mercury has also proposed that their use be phased down according to local needs. The development of tooth-coloured resin composites from [read the full story…]

Amalgam still an effective filling material for posterior teeth

shutterstock_50880346

Amalgam has been used for filling teeth for around 150 years. Over that time amalgam restoration have been shown to be a predictable, successful and cost effective.  Concerns regarding aesthetics and their mercury content together with improvement in tooth-coloured dental resin cements have seen a decline in their use.  Recently the Minamata Convention on Mercury [read the full story…]