Periodontal disease is common with the worldwide prevalence of gingivitis varying between 50% to 90% for all adults worldwide. Severe periodontitis is estimated to affect >10% of the world’s population and more than 45% of US adults over 3O years of age had (mainly) moderately sever periodontitis. Studies suggest periodontal disease rates during pregnancy to range from 11-100%. While a number of studies have suggested an association between adverse pregnancy outcomes (pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery and low birth weight) and periodontal disease others have not.
The aim of this systematic overview was to perform a comprehensive synthesis of findings from systematic reviews assessing the link between periodontal disease and a broad range of adverse pregnancy outcomes, focusing on interpreting findings from the highest- quality reviews.
Searches were conducted in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline EMBASE, World Health Organization Global Health Library and Google Scholar databases. PROSPERO was searched for unpublished, ongoing, and recently completed systematic reviews.
Systematic reviews that searched several databases and included prospective/retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and/or case- control or nested case-control studies comparing pregnancy outcomes and periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) were considered. Two reviewers independently selected studies abstracted data and assessed risk of bias using the AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) checklist. No meta-analysis was performed, because of the overlap of primary studies in the meta-analyses included in the review. Findings are described in tabular and narrative format.
- 23 reviews reporting on a total of 120 studies were included.
- The number of primary studies in the reviews ranged from 3-45.
- No reviews reported about the association between periodontal disease and maternal or perinatal mortality.
- 17 reviews considered association between periodontal disease and preterm birth, 7 performed a meta-analysis. The reviews included a total of 70 primary studies with a high degree of overlap (CCA= 11.6%).
- 9 reviews reported on periodontal disease and pre-eclampsia, 5 performed a meta-analysis (In total 23 primary studies CCA= 30.4%)
- 16 reviews reported on the association between periodontal disease and low birth weight, 6 performed a meta-analysis (In total 48 primary studies CCA= 20.8%)
- 17 reviews investigated the association between periodontal disease and preterm low birth weight, 7 performed a meta-analysis (In total 51 primary studies CCA= 10%) Bases on the systematic reviews with the lowest risk of bias for each outcomes positive associations positive associations between periodontal disease and pregnancy outcomes are shown in the table below along with the estimated population- attributable fractions.
|Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI
|No of studies
|No of participants
|Est. population- attributable fractions
|RR =1.6 (1.3 to 2.0)
|5% to 38%
|Low birth weight
|RR =1.7 (1.3 to 2.1)
|6% to 41%
|OR =2.2 (1.4 to 3.4)
|10% to 55%
|RR =3.4 (1.3 to 8.8)
|17.9% to 70.6%
The authors concluded: –
Given the evidence presented in this comprehensive overview of systematic reviews, we propose that the association between periodontal disease and various common and severe adverse pregnancy outcomes is now sufficiently established for the field to start moving beyond conducting additional primary epidemiologic studies and systematic reviews in this area. There is now a need to focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying the link between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes to inform the development of targeted therapies and preventive strategies.
While this well conducted overview helpfully draws together the large number of systematic review that have been conducted on this topic there are still important concerns regarding the quality of the primary studies on which these reviews are based. Two important issues are highlighted by the authors themselves; the failure of many of the primary studies to consistently report confounders (for example smoking, socioeconomic status, maternal age, and ethnicity) this could lead to an overestimation of the association measures between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes; variation with the definition of periodontal disease used in primary studies with only 3 systematic reviews actually reporting a definition. Concerns relating to the quality of the primary studies included in these reviews highlight the need to interpret the finding of this overview with caution. It is also worth highlighting as do the author of the overview that, association does not confer causality.
In relation to this it is worth noting that a recent Cochrane review (Dental Elf – 19th Jun 2017) assessing the impact of treating periodontal disease on pregnancy outcomes included 15 randomised trials concluding:
It is not clear if periodontal treatment during pregnancy has an impact on preterm birth (low-quality evidence). There is low-quality evidence that periodontal treatment may reduce low birth weight (< 2500 g), however, our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. There is insufficient evidence to determine which periodontal treatment is better in preventing adverse obstetric outcomes. Future research should aim to report periodontal outcomes alongside obstetric outcomes.
L.A. Daalderop, B.V. Wieland, K. Tomsin, L. Reyes, B.W. Kramer, S.F. Vanterpool, and J.V. Been. Periodontal Disease and Pregnancy Outcomes: Overview of Systematic Reviews JDR Clinical & Translational Research Article first published online: September 25, 2017.
Dental Elf – 19th Jun 2017
Dental Elf – 30th Sep 2015