Dental adhesive systems: HEMA-free or HEMA-containing systems?

shutterstock_100849522

22 RCTs were included in this review of the influence of the monomer HEMA in the formulation of dental adhesive systems suggests that HEMA-free adhesive systems do not have better clinical performance of the non-carious cervical lesion restorations than HEMA-containing systems.

[read the full story...]

Flowable composites: clinical performance in non-carious cervical lesions

Abrasion_1

Kenny Strain takes a look at this recent review of flowable composite use in non-carious cervical lesions. 8 small RCTs of low quality were included with the authors suggesting flowable composites have improved marginal adaptation at 1 and 3 years.

[read the full story...]