Conventional or self-ligating bracket use not an important predictor of mandibular intermolar width in non-extractions orthodontic cases

shutterstock_81157801-orthodontic appliance

The aim of this study was to compare intermolar widths after alignment of crowded mandibular dental arches in non-extraction adolescent patients between conventional and self-ligating brackets.

The trial included patients requiring non-extraction treatment in both arches, having all mandibular teeth erupted with no spaces in the mandibular arch, mandibular irregularity index from canine to canine greater than 2 mm, and no therapeutic intervention planned involving intermaxillary or other intraoral or extraoral appliances including elastics before the end of the observation period.

Patients were randomized to receive either a conventional appliance, or a passive self-ligating appliance, both with a 0.022-in slot.

The amount of crowding of the mandibular dentition at baseline was assessed by using the irregularity index. Intermolar width was investigated using a linear regression analysis. On an exploratory basis, the effect of appliance type on intercanine width was also assessed. Additionally, the effects of appliance type on time to alignment and crowding on time to alignment were assessed by using the Cox proportional hazards model.

The authors  found no evidence of difference between the two bracket systems in terms of

  • intermolar width    (β = 0.30; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.9; P = 0.30)
  • intercanine width   (β = 0.33; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0.1; P = 0.15)
  • the time to reach alignment (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2; P = 0.21).

Whereas the amount of crowding was a significant predictor of the required time to reach alignment (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.8 to 0.9; P = 0.02).

The authors concluded

The use of conventional or self-ligating brackets does not seem to be an important predictor of mandibular intermolar width in non-extractions patients when the same wire sequence is used.

Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):e99-e105. PubMed PMID: 21889063.


Share on Facebook Tweet this on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+
Mark as read
Create a personal elf note about this blog
Profile photo of Derek Richards

Derek Richards

Derek Richards is the Director of the Centre for Evidence-based Dentistry, Editor of the Evidence-based Dentistry Journal, Consultant in Dental Public Health with Forth Valley Health Board and Honorary Senior Lecturer at Dundee & Glasgow Dental Schools. He helped to establish both the Centre for Evidence-based Dentistry and the Evidence-based Dentistry Journal. He has been involved with teaching EBD and a wide range of evidence-based initiatives both nationally and internationally since 1994.

More posts - Website

Follow me here –