New study demonstrates effectiveness of antipsychotic Pimavanserin for Parkinson’s disease psychosis


When we think of Parkinson’s disease (PD), hallucinations and delusions are probably not the first symptoms that come to mind. And yet, it is estimated that nearly half of all patients with PD experience psychotic symptoms at one time or another.

Although deficits in motor function are seen as the hallmark of PD, it is the non-motor symptoms such as depression that are highly predictive of drop in quality of life. In fact, psychotic symptoms specifically predict the need to be placed in a nursing home (Chaudhuri et al., 2006).

Unlike schizophrenia, hallucinations in PD are primarily visual rather than auditory or somatic (Chen, 2004), and can initially be benign. As disease severity increases however, paranoid delusions and delirium can become frequent and distressing (Chaudhuri et al., 2006).

The cause of PD psychosis is not fully understood. Due to the link between excess dopamine and psychosis, one might think that dopamine agonists typically prescribed to treat motor symptoms in PD would be responsible. In reality, PD psychosis has been associated with a range of factors, including old age, dementia, comorbid depression, general illness severity and, indeed, dopaminergic medication (Weintraub & Hurtig, 2007).

Antipsychotics primarily exert their therapeutic effect by blocking D2 dopamine receptors, which in PD can worsen symptoms. As a consequence, NICE guidelines advise against using typical and atypical antipsychotics, except clozapine for severe psychosis (National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, 2006), so it is important that a more viable and efficacious treatment for PD psychosis be found.

A recent paper in the Lancet examines a new antipsychotic called Pimavanserin, which has been specifically designed to treat PD psychosis. In a comment published alongside the article, Dr. Susan Fox of the University of Toronto summarised that:

In The Lancet, Jeffrey Cummings and colleagues present a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showing benefit and safety of the non-dopaminergic drug Pimavanserin for the treatment of psychosis in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Rather than blocking dopamine receptors, Pimavanserin works as a selective serotonin 5-HT2A inverse agonist. An inverse agonist works by binding to the receptor as an agonist would, but decreases the activity at this receptor, effectively working as an antagonist.

Genetic polymorphisms in the 5-HT2A receptor have been linked with psychosis. Furthermore, the binding of such receptors has been found to increase in PD, particularly in visual regions of the brain, thus thought to underlie the visual hallucinations common in PD psychosis. By decreasing the activity of this receptor, Pimavanserin may therefore help reduce psychotic symptoms.

It's estimated that nearly half of all Parkinson's disease patients experience psychotic symptoms at some point

It’s estimated that nearly half of all Parkinson’s disease patients experience psychotic symptoms at some point


The study team screened participants at 52 centres in the USA and two in Canada. The original sample consisted of 199 patients over the age of 40, having had Parkinson’s disease for at least one year, and whose psychotic symptoms began after the onset of PD. Their psychotic symptoms also had to occur on a weekly basis, and be severe enough to warrant treatment with antipsychotics. Participants were randomised into one of two arms:

  1. Placebo
  2. 40 mg of Pimavanserin once-daily

The duration of the trial was 6 weeks, with assessments completed at baseline, and days 15, 29, and 43. The primary outcome measure was symptom reduction, using a version of the Schedule for Assessment of Positive Symptoms adapted for Parkinson’s disease (SAPS-PD). Additional outcomes included participants’ caregivers being asked to measure caregiver burden, night-time sleep quality and daytime wakefulness. Finally, masked site investigators evaluated change in clinical global severity (CGI-S) and improvement (CGI-I) at the end point.

A 2-week lead-in of brief psychosocial therapy was also used to elicit a placebo response prior to the study commencing, thus in theory limiting the impact of the placebo effect during the trial.

The analysis was conducted using the mixed model repeated measures method, useful for dealing with participant dropout in longitudinal studies, a potential source of Type I error (false positives).


  • 185 participants were included in the final sample, 95 receiving pimavanserin, 90 receiving placebo
  • Mean SAPS-PD scores were lower in the treatment arm, showing a decrease in symptoms of -5·79 compared with -2·73 for those in the placebo group. This equates to a difference of -3·06 (95% CI -4·91 to -1·20; p=0·001), with a standardised effect size (Cohen’s d) of 0.5
  • Patients in the treatment arm also had significantly greater improvements in both clinical global impression ratings, showed reduced caregiver burden, and improvement in night-time sleep without increasing daytime sedation
  • Crucially, there was no evidence of motor function impairment relating to the treatment in either group


The authors conclude that:

As a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist, pimavanserin is to our knowledge the first in a new class of therapeutic agents able to confer antipsychotic benefit in Parkinson’s disease psychosis without unnecessary receptor activity that compromises safety and tolerability.

In the accompanying comment, Dr Fox indicates that Pimavanserin may:

…offer an alternative therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease psychosis without worsening motor symptoms.

Patients on Pimavanserin had fewer symptoms, reduced caregiver burden and improvements in sleep and clinical global impression ratings

Patients on Pimavanserin had fewer symptoms, reduced caregiver burden and improvements in sleep and clinical global impression ratings


The study was well-designed all around. The sample was reasonably large, and the team sampled from a large number of sites across the USA and two in Canada. The groups were well matched for age and gender, and these variables did not have any significant effect on outcome measures. They also employed a novel method of limiting the placebo effect by giving all participants daily psychosocial interaction two weeks before commencing the trial.

The effect size for the primary outcome, 0.5, is considered a “medium” effect size (although this is somewhat arbitrary). The magnitude of such an effect size is typically considered clinically meaningful.

Virtually all participants were on dopaminergic drugs for PD, which the trial did not require a reduction of at study entry. This would indicate that Pimavanserin can be safely taken alongside standard PD medication.


  • The study was funded by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, the company that manufactures Pimavanserin. Additionally, the author publishing the accompanying commentary had previously consulted for ACADIA. While this naturally raises alarm bells regarding bias, it is commendable that the study was registered with before being conducted. Many big Pharma companies have been encouraged to pre-register trials in recent years so as to ensure that all clinical trials are published, even those with null findings (an issue of great importance according to Bad Science writer Ben Goldacre).
  • Although this is the longest trial of pimavanserin to date (and longer than most PD psychosis RCTs), it is still relatively short (6 weeks). Since psychosis is predictive of nursing home admission in PD, a longer trial would be more useful in capturing this outcome. Longer trials may also help shed light on potential adverse effects of the medication that would not crop-up in a shorter trial (e.g. weight gain).
  • It was not explained why 40 mg was chosen as the dose of Pimavanserin to be given to all participants in the treatment arm of the trial. It’s worth noting that the small number of previous trials of Pimavanserin in humans scaled dosage up from 20 to 60 mg without adverse effects.
  • The primary outcome was an overall drop of -3.06 in SAPS-PD scores. The SAPS-PD is a new measure adapted for this population, so it is difficult to know how clinically meaningful the result is. To their credit, the authors did isolate scores for hallucination and delusion items of the SAPS, showing a similar drop of -3.37 (95% CI -5·40 to -1·35, d= 0.50). With each item on a 6-point scale representing the frequency and intensity of a symptom, a 3-point drop seems meaningful, but there is no indication in the article of whether this drop is on one item or spread across several.
  • No Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) was reported. TDM measures concentrations of medication in the blood or plasma. Since each individual metabolises medication differently, the desired or adverse effects of a drug will correlate more closely with TDM measures than dosage.
  • In the accompanying published comment, Dr. Fox points out that overall PD duration was not explicitly stated, although the average disease rating for all participants indicated a mild-to-moderate severity. She also points out that while the adverse infections some participants suffered in the study were unrelated to the treatment, these infections may have been treated with antibiotics, potentially affecting psychosis scores.


Cummings J, Isaacson S, Mills R, Williams H, Chi-Burris K, Corbett A, Dhall R, Ballard C. Pimavanserin for patients with Parkinson’s disease psychosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):533-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62106-6. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (2006). Parkinson’s Disease: National Clinical Guideline for Diagnosis and Management in Secondary Care (PDF). Royal College of Physicians, London.

Chaudhuri, K., Healy, D. G., & Schapira, A. H. (2006). Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: diagnosis and management. The Lancet Neurology, 5(3), 235-245.

Chen, J. J. (2004). Anxiety, depression, and psychosis in Parkinson’s disease: unmet needs and treatment challenges. Neurologic clinics, 22(3), S63-S90.

Weintraub, D., & Hurtig, H. (2007). Presentation and management of psychosis in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(10), 1491-1498.

Share on Facebook Tweet this on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+