People with long-term conditions, such as diabetes or heart disease, are two to three times more likely to experience mental health problems than the general population. However, a systemic failure to identify these problems and provide effective support is resulting in poorer outcomes for patients and could be costing the NHS billions, says a report published today by The King’s Fund and Centre for Mental Health.
Too often a mental health condition goes undetected where there is a co-existing long-term physical health condition. Where a mental health problem is identified alongside a physical health illness, the two have traditionally been treated separately with services designed around conditions rather than patients. A growing volume of research evidence suggests that more integrated approaches, with closer working between professionals responsible for patients’ mental and physical health, can improve outcomes while also reducing costs.
Researchers found that by exacerbating physical illnesses, co-existing mental health problems substantially increase the costs related to care for long-term conditions. Overall, £1 in every £8 spent on long-term conditions is linked to poor mental health, equating to £8-13 billion of NHS spending each year. For example, co-existing mental health problems can lead to:
- Increased hospitalisation rates: patients with chronic lung disease spend twice as long in hospital if they also have a mental health problem
- Increased outpatient service use: diabetes sufferers with mental health problems access twice the amount of outpatient services as those with diabetes alone
- Less effective self-management: poor mental health means that people with heart disease or other long-term conditions are less likely to look after their physical health, take medication as intended and attend medical appointments.
Not only do associated mental health conditions carry a significant financial cost for the NHS, the report shows they also contribute to poorer clinical outcomes for patients and lower quality of life. For example, studies have shown:
- Depression increases mortality rates after a heart attack by 3.5 times
- Children with diabetes are more likely to suffer retinal damage if they also have depression
- Co-existing mental health problems can have a greater effect on quality of life than the severity of the physical illness.
There are also wider financial implications for individuals, families and the economy. People with both a long-term condition and a mental health problem are less likely to have a job than those with a physical illness alone; take twice as many sickness days; and are more likely to rely on informal care, which in turn leads to family members taking time off work.
In Long-term conditions and mental health: the cost of co-morbidities, researchers review the available evidence on the interaction between mental health and long-term conditions and offer examples of innovative practice from the UK and abroad to combat the problems associated with the co-existing conditions. They conclude that a more integrated approach will help the NHS to make savings, improve patient outcomes, and meet its targets on productivity improvement.
Chris Naylor, the report’s lead author and Fellow at The King’s Fund said:
The prevailing approach towards improving care for people with long-term conditions is at risk of failing unless we look at patients’ needs as a whole, including their mental health needs. To achieve this, mental health provision cannot simply be tacked on to physical care but needs to be an integral part of it.
Sean Duggan, Chief Executive, Centre for Mental Health said:
Failing to support the mental health of people with long-term physical conditions is costing the NHS billions of pounds at a time it can ill afford to spend money unwisely. Untreated or poorly managed mental ill-health among this group is cutting lives short, reducing quality of life and increasing health inequalities. Responding better, by contrast, will save lives, increase fairness and cut costs.
Long-term conditions and mental health: the cost of co-morbidities (PDF). The King’s Fund and The Centre for Mental Health, 9 Feb 2012.
Topiary artfully done not blind slash and burn! the old advertising slogan – work smarter!? Efficiency and efficacy are quite close but the nuances and clearer reference points of the latter are on the right track!
The difficulty is getting a group culture towards this – difficult with the cuts agenda creating defensiveness and distress! And the right solutions – big health centres? No – too big and seen as threatening by gp practices I think? People are disgruntled and also satisfied with GPs in different ways generally I think: it can’t be efficient on a buildings level to change the physical and organisations around – but rather support GP surgeries to offer holistic services they’d like and perhaps add-in high-street advice/counseling/self-care/nurse-outreach shops?