Local alcohol licensing policies associated with reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions

No_alcohol

The hazardous and harmful use of alcohol is a major public health issue. It is estimated that around nine million adults in England drink to potentially harmful levels, and the cost of alcohol misuse to the NHS is around £3.5 billion every year. A further £11 billion per year is spent as a result of alcohol-related crime and £7.3 billion due to lost productivity.

One key strategy concerning alcohol price and availability is licensing, which modifies our drinking environment. Evidence indicates that there is an association between the number of alcohol outlets in neighbourhoods and alcohol-related hospital admissions; therefore restricting the number of alcohol outlets is a potential avenue for reducing alcohol-related harm.

Local authorities have the power to limit both on- and off-trade alcohol outlets. They can refuse individual license applications and they can designate cumulative impact zones (CIZs) to control new alcohol outlets in places where the addition of more would challenge crime prevention and public safety, create a public nuisance or expose children to harm.

In a recent study published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, authors evaluate whether differences in CIZ implementation and licensing scrutiny by local councils has an impact on population health.

Estimates suggest that alcohol misuse costs the NHS £3.5 billion a year.

Estimates suggest that alcohol misuse costs the NHS £3.5 billion a year.

Methods

Alcohol licensing data was obtained for 326 lower tier local authorities (LTLAs) in England for the years 2007/2008 and 2011/2012, data from 319 of these local authorities was used in the analyses.

A ‘cumulative licensing intensity score’was developed for each LTLA, this score was divided into four categories; no activity (passive) and 3 levels of intensity (low, medium, high).

Authors looked at the association of licensing intensity with quarterly hospital admission data (standardised for age) with a primary alcohol-related admission for the period 2009-2015. Primary alcohol related admissions are conditions wholly attributable to alcohol, such as alcohol liver disease, ethanol poisoning, malignant neoplasms of the oesophagus and hypertensive diseases. They also controlled for influential factors such as deprivation data, alcohol-related crime rates and population size.

Results

The cumulative licensing intensity score was classified as:

  • Inactive in 43% of authorities
  • Low intensity in 21% of authorities
  • Medium or high in 35% of authorities

Hierarchical growth modelling was used to analyse the data. The inclusion of baseline deprivation, population size and alcohol related crimes in the model explained around 50% of the baseline variability in admission rates between LTLAs. There was no evidence that they could explain changes beyond this over the 2009-2015 period.

The main finding was that the intensity of alcohol policies in LTLAs was associated with larger reductions in alcohol-related hospital admissions. This change in hospital admission rates in the areas with the highest intensity policies was -2% (95% CI -3% to -2%) annually (p=0.05). This is equal to a 5% reduction or 8 fewer alcohol-related admissions per 100,000 people in 2015, compared to if these authorities did not have active policies in place.

In authorities with a medium intensity policy, a non-significant decrease in admission rates of 0.6% annually was found. This is equal to a doubling of reduction in admission rates compared with authorities that were non-active.

Local areas with the most intensive licensing policies saw the biggest reductions in alcohol-related hospital admissions.

Local areas with the most intensive licensing policies saw the biggest reductions in alcohol-related hospital admissions.

Discussion

The results from this study indicate that there is a greater reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions in local government areas that have more intensive alcohol licensing policies. Active licensing policies are defined by authors as those with CIZs present and more intense scrutiny of license applications.

It is concluded that:

The more intensely alcohol licensing policies are implemented in a local area, the stronger their effect on reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions.

Strengths and limitations

  • More active policies are often introduced in areas with higher levels of harm. Authors adjusted for this in the models by taking into account confounding variables such as baseline deprivation, population size and alcohol-related crime data.
  • The association does not prove causality. For example, authors emphasise that the drop in admissions could be due to that area adopting other alcohol policies such as late night levies or policies aimed specifically at reducing health harms, such as screening and brief interventions.
  • Authors note that data on accident and emergency department visits was not included in the statistics used. Future research on the impact of licensing on acute societal impacts may help to further explain the data. For example, there may be a larger effect on acute alcohol poisoning or crime, as local policies are often aimed at reducing immediate societal impacts.

Conclusions

This study is the first to demonstrate that in areas with more active licensing policies, there is a greater reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions. Although conclusions about cause and effect can’t be drawn, the association between the two suggests a population level benefit of policies that restrict licensing.

Should this research inspire Directors of Public Health to consider more active licensing policies?

Should this research inspire Directors of Public Health to consider more active licensing policies?

Links

Primary paper

de Vocht F, Heron J, Angus C, Brennan A, Mooney J, Lock K. et al (2015) Measurable effects of local alcohol licensing policies on population health in England. J Epidemiol Community Health. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206040 [Abstract]

Other references

Health Committee. Written evidence from the Department of Health (GAS 01). UK Parliament, 2012. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhealth/132/132we02.htm#footnote_1 (accessed 26 Aug 2015). http://www.webcitation.org/6b4MqIXYL

PHE. User guide: Local Alcohol Profiles for England 2014 London 2014:23. http://www.lape.org.uk/downloads/LAPE%20User%20Guide_Final.pdf (accessed 26 Aug 2015). http://www.webcitation.org/6b4Nlogai

Public Health England. Alcohol treatment in England 2013-14. London: Public Health England; 2014. http://www.nta.nhs.uk/uploads/adult-alcohol-statistics-2013-14-commentary.pdf

Richardson EA, Hill SE, Mitchell R, et al. Is local alcohol outlet density related to alcohol-related morbidity and mortality in Scottish cities? Health Place. 2015;33:172-80.

Photo credits

Share on Facebook Tweet this on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+
Mark as read
Create a personal elf note about this blog
Profile photo of Natasha Clarke

Natasha Clarke

Natasha is a researcher at University College London and studied for her PhD in the Addiction Group at the University of Liverpool. Her research interests are in the assessment of harm-reduction strategies for alcohol use, particularly in student populations. She enjoys blogging, and writes both opinion and research pieces for her own blog (‘Diary of an Alcohol Researcher’ https://tash13579.wordpress.com/) and the Addiction Group’s blog (http://livuniaddictiongroup.blogspot.co.uk/) whenever she finds the time.

More posts

Follow me here –