Depression is a common problem in older adults with some data suggesting significant symptoms are present in over 40% of nursing home residents (Teresi, 2001). Clearly physical exercise has a number of benefits particularly with regards to cardiovascular health.
Some of you may remember the Mental Elf blog back in September 2012 with positive results from a systematic review looking specifically at exercise for depression in older people.
Given the medical comorbidities in this population and risks associated with polypharmacy, looking at effectiveness of non-pharmalogical interventions is important.
The Lancet have recently published the OPERA (Older People’s Exercise intervention in Residential and nursing Accommodation) study. This cluster randomised controlled trial led by a team at Warwick University, compared symptoms of depression (baseline and 12 month follow up) in an intervention group of care homes receiving a structured moderate intensity activity programme with a control group.
Methods

180 care homes in the Coventry and Warwick region and in North East London were approached to take part in the study. A total of 73 homes with between 16 and 70 beds were included. All participants were over the age of 65 and permanent residents. Inappropriate residents were excluded (acute or terminal illness, recent bereavement, communication problems).
- Homes were randomised to intervention or control groups.
- Intervention homes had depression awareness training, a twice weekly 45 minute group exercise session led by a Physiotherapist (for up to 12 months, no minimum duration) and general advice on being more physically active (whole home component). Control homes just had the depression awareness training.
The primary outcome measured was Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) score. This was assessed at baseline and 12 months following randomisation for all participants (overall cohort). The team decided on differences in GDS of 1.2 points to be clinically important.
Patients who were depressed at baseline (depressed cohort), also had the GDS-15 repeated at 6 months post randomisation. A cross-sectional analysis was also carried out (prevalence of depression amongst all participants resident in a study home at 12 months).
Secondary comparisons included MMSE, quality of life (EQ-5D), and fear of falling.
Results

The bottom line from the study was:
We identified no statistically significant, or clinically important, between-group differences in the GDS-15 score.
- In the overall cohort, the control group was actually found to be slightly less depressed – “The adjusted mean difference in GDS scores between the two groups at 12 months was 0·13 points (95% CI –0·33 to 0·60, p=0·5758)”
- In the depressed cohort, both the intervention and control group had a drop of around 1 point in their GDS-15 scores – “the adjusted mean difference was 0·22 (95% CI –0·52 to 0·95, p=0·5662)”
- 43% of the intervention group (n=288) and 49% of the control group (n=307) were depressed at 12 months – odds ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0·53 to 1·09, p=0·1304)
- No difference was found between the intervention and control groups in the secondary outcomes
Conclusions
The authors concluded:
We identified no evidence that our intervention had a positive effect on any of our carefully selected primary or secondary outcomes. This evidence does not support the use of this type of intervention to reduce the burden of depressive symptoms in residents of care homes, and alternative strategies for this common and important problem are needed.

This is a well designed study with a good number of participants and I think it is useful in that it shows that the particular package studied was not effective in this population. The value of a non-pharmacological intervention which improves depressive symptoms in this group is undeniable and I believe the area warrants further study.
The interventions looked at in the systematic review mentioned earlier (Teresi, 2001), were exercise between 3 and 5 times a week and it may be that the frequency of group sessions was not high enough to have an effect, however such a high intensity programme may not be so attractive to elderly care home residents.
Links
Underwood M. et al Exercise for depression in elderly residents of care homes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 May 1. pii: S0140-6736(13)60649-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60649-2. [Lancet abstract] [Full PDF monograph from HTA website]
Teresi J, Abrams R, Holmes D, Ramirez M, Eimicke J. Prevalence of depression and depression recognition in nursing homes. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 December; 36(12): 613–620 [PubMed abstract]
Raina Casarez
13 years agopendagoddess
13 years agoVictoria_BPP
13 years agoBillyJack2
13 years agokimbsolutions
13 years agoRoslynByfield
13 years agoDrShirleyLock
13 years agoMental_Elf
13 years ago121Therapy
13 years ago121Therapy
13 years ago121Therapy
13 years agoknockdonbhoy
13 years agomulberrybush
13 years agodavid_colquhoun
13 years agoBPSOfficial
13 years agoMental_Elf
13 years agoSlabAdsMusic
13 years agoangliacounsel
13 years agoMental_Elf
13 years agoutilitytim
13 years agojimallthetime
13 years agoMental_Elf
13 years agoJulieHughes2013
13 years agoNexusdog_UK
13 years agoMental_Elf
13 years agoali_pals
13 years agoJacqui Rafferty
13 years agoAndré Tomlin
13 years agoaghoury79
13 years agoamadorpriede
13 years agohullodave
13 years ago